I’m just going to say right up front. When indoctrinated Americans take up the Muslim chant “from the river to the sea”; we need to ask them if they mean, “from the Mississippi River to the Atlantic? or from the Mississippi River to the Pacific? or both?” And immediately after asking them that; ask them why they believe that “native Americans should be put to death? or driven from their land?”
They probably will not have the critical thinking skills to understanding that in the same way that native Americans represent the oldest rightful People of the United States . . . so likewise the Hebrew nation have been the rightful People of the state of Israel for more than 4,000 years. So when ignorant white American college students and Democrats take up their chants of “death to America” and “death to Israel,” their logic of hatred is really to slaughter the native populations of Americans also.
Israel never abandoned their ancient homeland! They were scattered to the four corners of the world against their will.
The United Nations did not give the ancient home of Israel back to the Jewish People. The world, manifest in the United Nations in 1948 recognized that the Jewish People had a moral right to return to their homes; and the nations of the world recognized that civilized nations had a responsibility to honor the moral right of the Jewish People to return and be safe in the land they were brutally driven from.
Israel attacked no one; but over and over since 1948, Israel’s Muslim neighbors have attacked Israel because of their anti-Jewish racism. The People of Israel did nothing to be attacked.
The Muslim nations have consistently over the years since 1948 breathed out only hatred and death to the Jewish People—and now are joined by America’s government and the racist hatred against the Jewish People inspired by Democrats and educators to drive a new generation of jihadists to seek to drive Israel again from their homeland that God Almighty established for them.
The racist Muslims attacked Israel on October 7th; not the other way around. Israel should defend themselves and the United States People must NOT give aid to Israel’s enemies. All who take up the cause of destroying the Jewish People are not fighting the Jewish People; but rather, they are fighting against Almighty God Himself who will defeat all of Israel’s enemies. Let us never pretend we have a roll in fighting against God’s People. Be forewarned!
So, when you hear Left-Wingers calling for “death” to the home and claim on native Americans—and all whose roots are deep in American soil—Native Americans and all whose home is America the land many of every race have defended and kept free, and “death” to the Jewish People and Israel; ask them if they learned their racism and hatred from Marx, from their professors, from their racist parents, or the modern day Communist Democrat Party?
My dear friends, I just sent an email to my U.S. Representative, Beth van Duyne, R-TX-24, concerning legislation being prepared for consideration beginning the week of April 21, 2024, that is, in my sincere opinion, designed as a clandestine effort intended to result in the death–the assassination–of President Donald J. Trump in a jail cell, without the protection of the Secret Service.
Let that sink in. The Democrats have announced that next week, beginning April 21, 2024, they will introduce legislation to strip presidents convicted of a felony of their present authorized Secret Service protection detail. The Democrats are being deceitfully crafty by not specifically naming President Trump as the object of their legislation; but whom else, today, could be their legislative target?
And how would this legislation be used as a tripwire down the trail to President Trump’s assassination? It is very simple.
President Trump is already the target of legal persecution by crooked Democrat attorneys general, prosecutors, and judges at both state and federal level seeking to find ways to conduct “lawfare” against President Trump to destroy him financially and political because it is clear that they cannot defeat President Trump in the race for the presidency. They are at their wits end. So this legislation is designed to appear as a means of removing from “a president” their legal right to protection from the Secret Service. The legislation in not specifically worded to be limited to President Trump; but rather, is targeted to–“they,” whomever “they” may be–who may be a president “convicted” of a felony crime.
So, when the present court being conducted illegally on many levels, that can seat a jury with alternates in five days, being run by Democrats with a vested interest in Trump’s conviction, the stage is set for the Democrats to “Epstein” President Trump.
I am warning that if this legislation to remove a president’s Secret Service protection upon conviction is passed in the U.S. House of Representatives, it will be quickly passed likewise by the majority Democrat Senate and signed by Joe Biden at the speed of light. Then, when President Trump is railroaded and falsely convicted in this sham of a Manhattan court, and separated from his protective detail from the Secret Service, the court will immediately arrest President Trump and transport him to a solitary prison cell where the guards will fall asleep and jail cameras will stop working. Later as the lights come on in maximum security where President Trump has been secured–like in any Marxist prison or jail, they will find President Trump officially committed “suicide” precisely like Jeffrey Epstein before him–and who will have any evidence to say otherwise?
This Democrat legislation is the preamble to the assassination of President Trump in a jail cell by and on the behalf of the Democrat-Communist Party!
This legislation–and this illegal court MUST be stopped!
I am publishing this today, April 19, 2024, to ensure that Americans are able to see and link the betrayal of our Republican House of Representatives, led by Speaker Mike Johnson, to fund the $60B Ukraine endless war bill to continue funding the military-industrial complex (elites) endless weapons production—that President Dwight Eisenhower warned about in his farewell speech, January 17, 1961, provided below:
THE WHITE HOUSE TEXT OF THE ADDRESS BY PRESIDENT EISENHOWER, BROADCAST AND TELEVISED FROM HIS OFFICE NI THE WHITE HOUSE, TUESDAY EVENING, JANUARY 17, 1961, 8:30 TC 9:00 P.M.. EST.
My fellow Americans: Three days from now, after half a century in the service of our country, I shall lay down the responsibilities of office as, in traditional and solemn ceremony, the authority of the Presidency is vested in my successor.
This evening I come to you with a message of leave-taking and farewell, and to share a few final thoughts with you, my countrymen.
Like every other citizen, I wish the new President, and all who will labor with him, Godspeed. I pray that the coming years will be blessed with peace and prosperity for all.
Our people expect their President and the Congress to find essential agreement on issues of great moment, the wise resolution of which will better shape the future of the Nation.
My own relations with the Congress, which began on a remote and tenuous basis when, long ago, a member of the Senate appointed me to West Point, have since ranged to the intimate during the war and immediate post-war period, and, finally, to the mutually interdependent during these past eight years.
In this final relationship, the Congress and the Administration have, on most vital issues, cooperated well, to serve the national good rather than mere partisanship, and so have assured that the business of the Nation should go forward.
So, my official relationship with the Congress ends in a feeling, on my part, of gratitude that we have been able to do so much together.
II.
We now stand ten years past the midpoint of a century that has witnessed four major wars among great nations. Three of these involved our own country. Despite these holocauste America is today the strongest, prestige depend, not merely upon our unmatched material progress, riches and military strength, but on how we use our power in the interests of world peace and human betterment.
III.
Throughout America’s adventure in free government, our basic purposes have been to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and among nations. To strive for less would be unworthy of a free and religious people. Any failure traceable to arrogance, or our lack of comprehension or readiness to sacrifice would inflict upon us grievous hurt both at home and abroad.
Progress toward these noble goalsis persistently threatened by the conflict now engulfing the world. It commands our whole attention, absorbs our very beinge. We face a hostile ideology — global in scope, atheistic in character, ruthless in purpose, and insidious in method. Unhappily the danger it poses promises to be of indefinite duration. To meet it successfully, there is called for, not so much the emotional and transitory sacrifices of crisis, but rather those which enable us to carry forward steadily, surely, and without complaint the burdens of a prolonged and complex struggle — with liberty the stake. Only thus shall we remain, despite every provocation, on our charted course toward permanent peace and human betterment.
Crises there will continue to be. In meeting them, whether foreign or domestic, great or small, there is a recurring temptation to feel that some spectacular and costly action could become the miraculous solution to all current difficulties. A huge increase in newer elements of our defense; development of unrealistic prograins to cure every ill in agriculture; a dramatic expansion ni basic and applied research — these and many other possibilities, each possibly promising in itself, may be suggested as the only way to the road we wish to travel.
But each proposal must be weighed in the light of a broader consideration: The need to maintain balance in and among national programs — balance between the private and the public economy, balance between cost and hoped for advantage – balance between the clearly necessary and the comfortably desirable; balance between our essential requirements as a nation and the duties imposed by the nation upon the individual; balance between actions of the moment and the national welfare of the future. Good judgment seeks balance and progress; lack of it eventually finds imbalance and frustration.
The record of many decades stands as proof that our people and their government have, in the main, understood thase truths and have responded to them well, in the face of stress and threat. But threats, new in kind or degree, constantly arise. I mention two only.
IV.
A vital element in keeping the peace is our military establishment. Our arms must be mighty, ready for instant action, so that no potential aggressor may be tempted to risk his own destruction.
Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.
Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.
This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence – economic, political, even spiritual – – is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.
In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty may prosper together.
Akin to, and largely responsible for the sweeping changes in our industrial-military posture, has been the technological revolution during recent decades.
In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been overshadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. Partly because of the huge costs involved, a government contract becomes virtually a substitute for intellectual curiosity. For every old blackboard there are now hundreds of new electronic computers.
The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present — and is gravely to be regarded.
Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.
It is the task of statesmanship to mold, to balance, and to integrate these and other forces, new and old, within the principles of our democratic system — ever aiming toward the supreme goals of our free society.
V.
Another factor in maintaining balance involves the element of time, As we peer into society’s future, we—you and I, and our government—must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.
VI.
Down the long lane of the history yet to be written America knows that this world of ours, ever growing smaller, must avoid becoming a community of dreadful fear and hate, and be, instead, a proud soufedazarion of mutual trust and respect.
Such a confederation must be one of equals. The weakest must come to the conference table with the same confidence as do we, protected as we are by our moral, economic, and military strength. That table, though scarred by many past frustrations, cannot be abandoned for the certain agony of the battlefield.
Disarmament, with mutual honor and confidence, is a continuing imperative. Together we must learn how to compose differences, not with arms, but with intellect and decent purpose. Because this need is so sharp and apparent I confess that I lay down my official responsibilities in this field with a definite sense of disappointment. As one who has witnessed the horror and the lingering sadness of war — as one who knows that another war could utterly destroy this civilization which has been so slowly and painfully built over thousands of years — I wish I could say tonight that a lasting peace is in sight.
Happily, I can say that war has been avoided. Steady progress toward our ultimate goal has been made. But, so much remains to be done. As a private citizen, I shall never cease to do what little I can to help the world advance along that road.
VII
So — in this my last good night to you as your President — I thank you for the many opportunities you have given me for public service in war and peace. I trust that in that service you find some things worthy; as for the rest of it, I know you will find ways to improve performance in the future.
You and I – my fellow citizens – – need to be strong in our faith that all nations, under God, will reach the goal of peace with justice. May we be ever unswerving in devotion to principle, confident but humble with power, diligent in pursuit of the Nation’s great goals.
To all the peoples of the world, I once more give expression to America’s prayerful and continuing aspiration:
We pray that peoples of all faiths, all races, all nations, may have their great human needs satisfied; that those now denied opportunity shall come to enjoy it to the full; that all who yearn for freedom may experience its spiritual blessings; that those who have freedom will understand, also, its heavy responsibilities; that all who are insensitive to the needs of others will learn charity; that the scourges of poverty, disease and ignorance will be made to disappear from the earth, and that, in the goodness of time, all peoples will come to live together in a peace guaranteed by the binding force of mutual respect and love.
I am often thanked by my fellow Americans for my military service. Don’t misunderstand me, I appreciate it! I remember after I returned home from Vietnam few of my countrymen wanted to look at me, much less thank me for my service. I was thankful at the change I saw across America after the attacks carried out by our enemies on 9-11-2001. When I landed at DFW for my mid-tour leave from Afghanistan (yes, I fought in both Vietnam and Afghanistan), the welcome we received almost overwhelmed me! What a welcome change!
But have we now forgotten our great warriors who are now being attacked and abused by our president and those in charge of our Pentagon? Do you know that thousands of our service members gave their everything serving tour after tour in combat to defend our freedoms (yours and theirs), your choices, your way of life in America, but today, those seasoned defenders of our freedoms are being harassed, punished, and driven out of service before their retirements because they are exercising their own constitutional and religious rights to refuse mandatory injection of a proved dangerous and ineffective experimental injection against their consent?
That’s right! Today, when it is more important than ever that we retain our combat experienced warriors in service, our own federal government has joined America’s enemies, including our federal courts, and are attacking our most loyal citizens and defenders of America in their war to overthrow our Constitution!
If you truly support our currently serving warriors who are refusing to submit to this illegal mandate, trying to make them surrender their health and wellness to the political tyrants who hold their futures and America’s freedoms in contempt because our heroes won’t let them cancel their lives and careers, will you now demand that our federal government and courts vacate these illegal mandates and restore them all to duty without any possibility of derogatory reports and punitive action against them for exercising their constitutional and religious rights as Americans?
Our men and women in uniform are giving their all for you! What are you actually doing for them? Demand now that Biden and his Pentagon, anti-American, anti-Constitution tyrants, stop persecuting our sons and daughters for exercising the right they fought for us to keep! Fire Biden and all Democrats and Uniparty traitors! Do it every chance you get! Fight for those who have fought for you! Don’t just say it; do it!
Captain (Retired) Terry Michael Hestilow United States Army April 18, 2024
If I become the next Defense Secretary under President Trump, and the wind farms proposed and being built offshore in waters off the coast of California which would interfere with our critical submarine production and aircraft carrier operations and which would also interfere with our national defense security posture, we might expect the Russians to sabotage the wind farm’s support structures in the area unexpectedly just like they reportedly blew up their own Nordstream pipeline that fed the energy needs of Germany.
You can just never tell what those crazy Russians will do next!
For a sound national security posture we might need to help the whales and ourselves.
Captain Terry M. Hestilow United States Army, Retired April 18, 2023
There is no real question that China has launched biological war on not just the United States, but against most free market economies around the world. The question for patriotic Americans is what our response will be against not only China, in this new war (and it is war by any understanding), but what action must we take against China’s allies in their conduct of war on free nations by the United Nations, World Health Organization, and the Communist American Democrat Party. They are one and all enemies of our Constitution and our American way of life. We ARE at war already, and our own population is heavily corrupted with supporters of freedom’s enemies.
Can I say it any clearer?
CPT (Ret.) Terry Michael Hestilow, USA April 16, 2020
For those trying to defend China by suggesting that the Wuhan virus was enhanced so that “vaccines” could be prepared against any possible subsequent natural infection of populations; but the enhanced virus accidentally escaped from the lab purely by accident.
Those who believe this have been watching too many “Jurassic” dinosaur movies! Here’s a movie analogy that is more representative of Communists and Democrats. Think of the Nazi female officer whose life was designing chemical weapons in the movie “Wonder Woman”! Get the picture? That is who the Red Chinese are—with the aid of the U.N., WHO, Communist American Democrats (traitors), and the MSM (but now I am being redundant).
The infection pattern around the world plainly tells us that the Communist Chinese developed (for their own purposes in their attempt to dominate the world) the Wuhan virus—-a bio-weapon—and systematically dispatched massive numbers of infected carriers strategically around the world to infect intended populations (but not where they didn’t want it). This bio-weapon could never have spread like it did had it not been a deliberate action of the Communist Chinese as a hostile attack against free-market competitors.
CPT (Ret.) Terry Michael Hestilow, USA April 16, 2020
Originally posted in 2015. Extremely relevant today.
Exposing the truth about the attempts to justify murder in America.
There was a post I saw earlier today showing the dead body of a little girl about three or four who had been beaten to death by her father and step-mother … and then left as they fled the crime scene. I debated with myself if I should share it at the time, but wasn’t prepared to do so then. I have looked for it since, but I am now unable to find it. It may not really matter that I can’t show you the little girl, except that somehow actually “seeing” a child that has been beaten to death is far more moving and powerful than just reading and processing the information. So, for hers and other children’s sake, don’t lose sight of your mental picture of that little girl beaten to death as you read my post, and you should get what I am really driving at.
What I want to address–and I am in no way trying to justify the murderous betrayal of the little girl’s right to be able to trust in her parents–is the question, “why should this behavior by her 21st Century parents surprise us anymore?” In the following article I wrote originally on October 30, 2015, (and the reference to the present killing of the little girl is not the reference I was making in 2015; but rather another case was mentioned in question at the time) I address how we have conditioned people like this child’s father and step-mother to disregard and, or, hold in contempt this child’s life. And that is the problem! We have taught, through abortion, to contemporary Americans, that they have no reason to value certain human life. A gift of the Left.
Let me be clear! Anyone who justifies killing children through abortion have in fact justified the killing of children at any point if they represent a potential hardship or obstacle to a parent’s goals and objectives (or any other reason it seems). As revealed by the late Dr. Virginia Abernethey, professor emeritus at the Vanderbilt School of Medicine, killing children even up to the age of three or four (the age of the little girl identified in the post today) killed by her father and step-mother, our present government and medical community declare that these children should not be vested with the rights of personhood. The Supreme Court, the Establishment, the Democrats, the Liberals, and Planned Parenthood (literally every supporter of abortion) are each and every one of them, partly responsible for this little girl’s beating death!
Think I am going too far? Read my article and notice the foundation for the erosion of the value of human life we have arrived at today. My 2015 article (modified only for clarity and to note this post’s current date) follows:
You should understand that if the courts can ignore personhood at the beginning of life, they can deny your personhood at any other point in your life. The following is long, but it is extremely important and contains information that may not be available anymore from a 1985 Newsweek article. The abortion community has never believed adults should have to respect the life of a child. The excerpt that I draw from the text of the 1985 Newsweek article reveals an arrogant dismissal of any demand of “personhood” even around ages three or four. Please take the time and read the background. I think you will find it important. Thanks!
This case reflects the long corrupted Malthusian contempt for life responsible for the greatest slaughters of people throughout history. This kind of logic was employed in the infamous Dred Scott v Sandford decision by Chief Justice Roger Taney, writing for the Supreme Court’s majority, when in the 1857 Dred Scott v. Sandford case, the majority wrongly decided that no person of African descent could be worthy of citizenship in the United States, “even if freed” (Dred Scott was a slave suing for his freedom), and, as such, could not be considered “persons” under the U.S. Constitution and, therefore, were mere property that could be disposed of in whatever way the owner chose. The Dred Scott decision was a clear corruption of law that forced a Civil War to correct.
Likewise, in Nazi Germany we find that in 1933 the medical authorities sought, and gained from the political authorities in the Reich medical authorization to gas and kill people classified by the State as “devoid of value” (aka German Euthanasia Program). They were the elderly, the chronically ill, the handicapped, and those with mental limitations (and others) whom were consuming resources but contributing nothing to the State (“non-producers) to profit the Reich. It is from this German Euthanasia Program that “The Final Solution” was derived to kill the masses of people the State no longer recognized as “persons” under the German legal system of protection.
Like, Dred Scott (the African slave in early America), the elderly and ill had outlived their usefulness, and therefore, their right to be seen as “persons” protected by law. The German killing process was a clear corruption of the medical community that then corrupted the German legal and political community in Nazi Germany.
In 1973, in the infamous Roe v. Wade case, the Supreme Court doubled down on the errors of Dred Scott and the Nazi Euthanasia Program. Like Dred Scott, Justice Blackmun’s majority decision reflected a corruption of the legal community in the United States in that the so-called “Supreme Court” denied the right of personhood (specifically) to the pre-born child.
Justice Blackmun never said that the child was not “human” nor that it was not “alive”–but only that, under the [corrupted] interpretation of the US Constitution, it was not a “person” and could not be protected by the Constitution as a “person”. From there, the medical community recognized that they could make a lot of money from abortion and quickly abandoned the Hippocratic Oath for the profits of abortion.
In this case, the legal community became corrupted followed by the corruption of the medical community followed by the corruption of the political community followed by the corruption of the culture. In fact, biology and logic leads us to the truth of the situation.
From the point of conception you no longer have simply a cell of the mother or the cell of the father; but rather, a new unique living replicating human individual with their own DNA–their own unique human identity. And though it does not look the same, and proportionally is different from an adult while in the womb, its essence remains absolutely the same until the date of its natural death. None of us look the same at conception as we do at 1 day old or as we do at age 10, 20, 50, or 70 (as examples)–but our unique identity as living human individuals remains the same from conception to natural death.
The corrupted legal view of human life, however, has remained as corrupted from 1973 (and maybe 1857) as it is now.
In the posted article we read about a child injured in the womb who dies later [previous case]. But the following excerpt from Newsweek magazine, January 14, 1985, page 29, reveals the evil nature of the abortion mentality. This excerpt, entitled “The Hardest Question” by Kenneth Woodward with Mark D. Uehling, exposes that early on, just 12 years into legally protected child slaughter of “abortion on demand” in the United States, professors in medical schools in prestigious U.S. universities taught that “personhood” in children should not be recognized until “around [age] three or four” (and perhaps, like in Germany by logical extension, beyond our productive work years) to the elderly and ill and mentally retarded and handicapped as well.
Indeed, by today’s count, the United States has slaughtered more innocent people by multiplied many times what the German Third Reich did in the years from 1933-1945 [we owe them an apology].
The following is the Newsweek excerpt: “The gap between the two absolutist camps extends to the language they use. Most arguments about abortion turn on the status of the fetus. If, as some extreme pro-choicers insist, a fetus is merely a collection of cells, or tissue, or a ‘conceptus’–language that in itself denies any humanity to fetal life–then abortion is a morally neutral surgical procedure.
If, on the other hand, it is ‘a baby,’ then abortion is a form of killing–though not necessarily the crime of murder pro-life extremists claim it to be.
In most serious debates, however, it is taken as a biological fact that a fetus is alive [sic], human and unique–a developing human being. ‘If anyone seriously doubts that,’ says Jesuit moralist Richard McCormick of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics at Georgetown University, ‘they need only wait 266 days to see what they get.’ “It is one thing for the born to recognize the unborn as human, however, and quite another for society to vest them with moral or legal rights as persons.
‘I don’t think abortion is ever wrong,’ argues psychiatrist and anthropologist Virginia Abernethy of Vanderbilt University’s School of Medicine. ‘As long as an individual is completely dependent upon the mother, it’s not a person.’ In this view, which is shared by other pro-choice theorists, an individual becomes a person only when he or she becomes a responsible moral agent–around age three or four, in Abernethy’s judgment. Until then, she thinks, infants–like fetuses–are nonpersons; defective children, such as those with Down’s syndrome, may never become persons. The claim they have on persons, she says, is compassion, not a moral right to life: ‘Compassion is always very important, but [it] loses when weighed against the rights of a person.’” End of excerpt.
Abortion is, and always has been, the slaughter of innocent human life, and the Court’s decision in the cited article is simply the preservation of the corrupted view of the value, or in this case, the denial of value of human life. And we wonder why adult Americans and our children educated in public schools have such little understanding of the value of human life? In fact, what we are seeing acted out to our horror today is that these Americans are acting completely consistent with what they have been taught. We have taught them that all human life is completely disposable if approved by the State and is the desired end by those who control the victim’s well being–certainly since 1973.
CPT Terry Michael Hestilow, USA, Ret. Fort Worth, Texas April 16, 2015
Mat Staver and Liberty Counsel <alert@libertyaction.org> do magnificent and critical legal work defending America. If I could characterize their work I would compare them to our U.S. troops storming ashore on D-Day to defeat the Nazis.
I am sharing with you today an email I received today from Mat urging all of us to contact our respective congressional representatives in the U.S. House and Senate and urging them to “STOP the WHO Pandemic Treaty!” He calls all legitimate patriots in the House and Senate to “Vote ‘YES’ on HR 79, HR 1425 & S444.”
Mat helps to make it possible for you to send faxes to your representatives—which I encourage—but if you are unable to send faxes for economic reasons, I encourage you to compose your own letters (and I gave you examples you can use in my postings on this subject yesterday that you are free to use and modify to reflect your own sentiments to your own respective representatives and senators (each state has two senators) and send to them via the internet by searching your members by name and sending emails to them individually.
I am not undermining Mat’s initiative, but I do believe that individual letters in your own words are more effective than masses of faxes that are identical—and it is essential that we impress upon our representatives how evil the actions planned by Biden, the UN, and the WHO will be for the American people.
Read Mat’s letter and follow your patriotic and Christian conscience.
God bless you all,
Captain Terry M. Hestilow
United States Army, Retired
April 16, 202
The World Health Organization (WHO) appointed a panel of trans activists to create mandates that will be forced on member nations regarding “gender affirming” surgery and care. These dictates will be mandatory under international law for every country that signs on to the WHO’s new Pandemic Treaty and new International Health Regulations (IHR).
Despite existing WHO guidelines that prohibit the mutilation of girls’ genitalia, the WHO will now recommend and potentially mandate those practices in cases where the patient is confused about his or her gender.
The WHO’s World Health Assembly will meet in just a matter of weeks to approve the United Nations’ agency’s new Pandemic Treaty and new IHR. Joe Biden plans to sign this insane, politically driven set of documents that will bind America under international law. Only Congress can stop him, and only if we act now.
In 2008, the World Health Assembly passed resolution WHA61.16 emphasizing the elimination of female genital mutilation (FGM). According to the WHO, FGM is the practice of partially or completely removing or damaging a girl’s or woman’s external genitalia.
WHA61.16 required member nations to “take action” to eliminate female genital mutilation via health, women’s affairs, and justice sectors.
In its published guidelines, the WHO recited the “serious health consequences” associated with the mutilation of young women’s genitals which, according to the WHO, include “severe pain, hemorrhage, tetanus, sepsis, urine retention, ulceration of the genital region” and long-term ill effects, including “recurrent bladder and urinary tract infection, cysts, severe and adverse psychological and sexual consequences.”
But thanks to the near constant pressure of a rabid LGBTQ agenda eager to force “acceptance” of their delusions on the world, and the profit-driven “gender care” medical industry, the WHO has decided to make an exception to WHA61.16, allowing genital mutilation so long as the patients involved appear to be uncomfortable with their gender.
Up until 2019, just a little over four years ago, the WHO officially considered transgenderism to be a mental health disorder. But after pressure from LGBTQ groups, the WHO “updated” its global manual of diagnosis to remove any reference to gender dysphoria as a mental illness, and instead placed issues of “gender incongruence” under a chapter on sexual health.
But that was not enough for the LGBTQ gender benders and their puppet, WHO Director-General Tedros. In a bulletin released earlier this year, Tedros insisted that “Civil society and affected communities must mobilize to demand services, promote rights and reduce stigma” associated with transgenderism and other sexually deviant practices. Tedros also insisted the nations must “Counteract Conservative Opposition” to transgenderism.
Now the WHO has appointed a panel of transgender activists on a “Guideline Development Group” to draw up global health rules for “transgender” procedures, including promoting “gender affirming” surgeries that partially or completely remove a girl’s or woman’s genitals.
In other words, the WHO is setting a policy right now that FGM is wrong — unless it’s for LGBTQ purposes, in which case this destructive and dangerous practice is suddenly A-OK!
And this is just the beginning of what Joe Biden wants to force on America. We must demand Congress stop him before it’s too late.
Our medical policies should not be driven by politics, but on clear and unbiased science and reason. Nor should America’s health policies be dictated by an unelected globalist organization that developed its guidelines based on the recommendations of foreign staff members, many of whom aren’t even medical doctors, but are “trans” activists.
If Joe Biden signs the upcoming WHO Pandemic Treaty and updated International Health Regulations, these irrational and profit-focused people WILL set our national health guidelines and our laws.
That’s because, if signed, the Pandemic Treaty and IHR will have the force of international law. If America fails to comply, we will be dragged before the United Nations’ international courts and sanctioned until we change our laws to match the WHO demands.
We cannot allow this wholesale theft of our rights any more than we can risk the future of the many children and adults who have fallen victim to the social contagion known as “transgenderism.”
But Congress CAN stop this madness, by passing HR 1425 and S 444 — two bills that will STOP Joe Biden from selling America’s sovereignty to the WHO. Please, for the sake of our future and our children’s future, fax Congress NOW and demand they VOTE YES on HR 1425 & S 444.
Liberty Counsel is fighting on multiple fronts to stop this march toward globalist tyranny. Your faxes and petition signatures help us fight for freedom in Washington, D.C.
combatsoldier 